[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"permit-60":3},{"id":4,"acreageLimit":5,"changesFrom2021":6,"code":7,"commonProjects":8,"effectiveDate":15,"environmentalReview":16,"extension":17,"faq":18,"keyConditions":34,"linearFootLimit":5,"meta":41,"name":45,"pcnTrigger":5,"publicComments":49,"purpose":48,"relatedPermits":69,"seo":70,"shortName":46,"sourceDocumentUrl":67,"statutoryAuthority":47,"stem":71,"whoNeedsThis":50,"__hash__":72},"permits/permits/nwp-60.json",null,"The 2026 reissuance of NWP 60 represents the first full re-evaluation of this permit since its original introduction in 2021. The Corps determined that the existing qualitative requirements—specifically that projects must be designed to improve aquatic passage—remain sufficient to ensure that authorized activities result in no more than minimal individual and cumulative adverse environmental effects without the need for a national acreage limit.\n\nWhile the permit terms are essentially unchanged, the supporting decision document has been updated with the most recent environmental baseline data. This includes information from the 2022 National Lakes Assessment and the 2021 National Wetland Condition Assessment, providing an updated scientific foundation for the Corps' finding that these restoration-focused activities remain environmentally beneficial at a national scale.","60",[9,10,11,12,13,14],"Construction of a nature-like fishway using rock ramps","Modification of an existing culvert to include baffles for fish passage","Removal of a small sediment bar or fallen tree blocking a stream","Installation of a technical fish ladder at a small weir","Retrofitting a tide gate to allow for better aquatic organism movement","Maintenance of an existing fish bypass channel","2026-03-15","The Corps determined that the reissuance of NWP 60 results in a 'no effect' finding for federally-listed endangered or threatened species and designated critical habitat. This finding is maintained by General Condition 18, which requires project-specific ESA Section 7 consultation if an activity 'might affect' listed resources. Because many projects under this permit are designed specifically to aid listed fish, the review process ensures that construction timing avoids sensitive spawning or migration windows.\n\nCompliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act is ensured through General Condition 20. If a proposed fish passage project involves modifying an older structure that may be eligible for the National Register of Historic Places, a pre-construction notification is required, and the district engineer must complete the NHPA review process before work can begin. Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) is protected through regional conditions that ensure restoration work does not cause more than minimal adverse effects on sensitive marine or estuarine environments.","json",[19,22,25,28,31],{"q":20,"a":21},"Do I need to submit a PCN for a fishway project under NWP 60?","NWP 60 does not have a standalone PCN requirement in its national text, but you must still submit a PCN if the project triggers General Conditions for endangered species (GC 18) or historic properties (GC 20).",{"q":23,"a":24},"Can I use NWP 60 to remove a small dam?","No, the removal of low-head dams is specifically authorized under NWP 53. NWP 60 is intended for smaller obstructions and the construction of passage structures.",{"q":26,"a":27},"Is there an acreage limit for NWP 60?","There is no national numeric acreage limit for NWP 60, provided the district engineer determines the individual and cumulative impacts are minimal.",{"q":29,"a":30},"Does this permit cover culvert replacements?","It can cover the modification or expansion of culverts specifically for passage. General culvert maintenance or replacement for transportation is often covered under NWP 3 or NWP 14.",{"q":32,"a":33},"Can I use this permit in tidal waters?","Yes, NWP 60 authorizes activities in both tidal and non-tidal waters of the United States.",[35,36,37,38,39,40],"Project must be designed to restore or enhance aquatic organism passage","Does not authorize the removal of low-head dams (see NWP 53)","Must not change the hydraulic characteristics of the waterbody to the detriment of the ecosystem","Must comply with General Condition 18 regarding endangered species","Temporary fills must be removed and the site restored to pre-construction elevations","Authorized under both Section 10 and Section 404",{"path":42,"body":43,"title":68},"/permits/nwp-60",{"id":44,"code":7,"name":45,"shortName":46,"statutoryAuthority":47,"acreageLimit":5,"linearFootLimit":5,"pcnTrigger":5,"effectiveDate":15,"purpose":48,"changesFrom2021":6,"environmentalReview":16,"publicComments":49,"whoNeedsThis":50,"commonProjects":51,"keyConditions":52,"faq":53,"relatedPermits":59,"seo":64,"sourceDocumentUrl":67},"nwp-60","Activities to Improve Passage of Fish and Other Aquatic Organisms","NWP 60","10/404","Nationwide Permit 60 authorizes discharges of dredged or fill material and structures or work in navigable waters to restore or enhance the movement of fish and other aquatic organisms. This permit is designed to facilitate the removal of barriers and the construction of features that allow aquatic species to migrate, spawn, and access necessary habitats throughout a watershed. \n\nThe scope includes the construction and maintenance of conventional or nature-like fishways, the removal of small obstructions like fallen trees or sediment bars, and the modification of existing structures like culverts or tide gates. It is intended to streamline projects that provide a clear environmental benefit by reconnecting fragmented aquatic ecosystems and improving overall river and stream health.","Public feedback for NWP 60 was overwhelmingly positive, with many commenters emphasizing the importance of stream connectivity for biodiversity and climate resilience. Some commenters suggested that the permit should be expanded to include the removal of larger dams. The Corps declined this, stating that the removal of larger dams involves complex engineering and potential downstream risks that are better handled under NWP 53 or the individual permit process.\n\nOther commenters requested clarification on whether a PCN is required for small-scale barrier removals. The Corps responded that while NWP 60 does not have a standalone PCN requirement in its national text, many projects will still trigger a PCN under the General Conditions for endangered species, historic properties, or specific regional requirements. This structure allows for administrative efficiency while maintaining oversight for sensitive resources.","Compliance managers for state and local natural resource agencies, non-profit conservation groups, and municipal engineers use this permit. It is the primary tool for authorizing projects intended to upgrade culverts for fish passage, install fish ladders, or remove small debris jams to restore river flow.",[9,10,11,12,13,14],[35,36,37,38,39,40],[54,55,56,57,58],{"q":20,"a":21},{"q":23,"a":24},{"q":26,"a":27},{"q":29,"a":30},{"q":32,"a":33},[60,61,62,63],"NWP-3","NWP-13","NWP-27","NWP-53",{"title":65,"description":66},"NWP 60: Fish & Aquatic Organism Passage - 2026 Permit Guide","Nationwide Permit 60 (NWP 60) for fishways, fish ladders, and barrier removal. Aquatic connectivity restoration, mandatory PCN, and Section 10/404 authority on Course Clear.","https://cdn.courseclear.io/usace/decision_documents/NWP-60-2026-Final-Decision-Document.pdf","Nwp 60",[60,61,62,63],{"title":65,"description":66},"permits/nwp-60","EyNe68_tW2G-fDkI18CKOq_hJx9JT0Vs1xwWci03_10"]